Individuals are not good and sometimes make mistakes. We take shortcuts, forget tips on how to do things, or grow to be distracted at times after we shouldn’t. In most elements of our lives, these are usually not things which have dire consequences. At work, nonetheless, surrounded by hazards, these types of mistakes can alter lives, even finish them. So, regardless that human beings are usually not good, we have to make our safety programs as close to perfect as we can.
PPE Focus: Face Shields
Personal protective equipment (PPE) is a side of safety where individuals are inclined to make many mistakes, and for a variety of reasons. Often, we think that the mere wearing of PPE makes us resistant to injury. With as a lot emphasis as we place on eye protection and head protection, do we lose sight (no pun intended) of protecting our faces? Certainly, eye protection is important, since eye injuries can lead to everlasting blindness. Equally necessary is head protection, stopping fatal head accidents the perfect that we can. Face injuries might not appear as significant a priority. They don’t have the instant, everlasting, and probably fatal penalties of the others. With that said, though, an employer’s duty is to protect all parts of their staff, including their faces.
That duty contains figuring out tasks the place face shields should be used, providing face shields for employees to make use of, training them to use face shields accurately, and to appropriate staff when face shields are used incorrectly or not used at all. The primary parts are easy. Our employees will make mistakes. Correcting those errors and enforcing your organization’s face shield requirements is an essential part of an effective PPE program. Unfortunately, too usually, this facet of the PPE program isn’t enforced till after an worker is injured.
Conditions to Use Face Shields
Consider the next conditions the place face shields should have been used, and the results for the injured workers and their employers.
An employee was filling ammonia nurse tanks from a bulk plant. The employee was distracted while closing the valves, and mistakenly turned the wrong valve, inflicting a pressure release within the line. The discharge of anhydrous ammonia splashed on the employee’s face. The worker was hospitalized for chemical burns on and around the face.
An worker was installing a water pipe at a multifamily residential building project. The worker initially was operating an excavator, then climbed down from the excavator to cut a ten-inch water pipe with a minimize-off saw. The saw kicked back and struck the employee’s face. Co-workers called emergency services, who transported the employee to the hospital. The worker was admitted to the hospital and treated for facial lacerations that extended from underneath the left eye to underneath the jaw.
Within the first situation, the worker suffered severe chemical burns. A face shield would have significantly reduced the chemical exposure, the extent of the chemical burns, and possibly might have prevented any ammonia from splashing on the worker’s face. Yes, the worker turned the fallacious valve, however does that mean that the employer is absolved of all accountability for this incident? In fact not. The fact stays that the employer should provide employees filling ammonia nurse tanks with face shields, train workers to use the face shields appropriately, and require them to use them when performing this task. Then they have to continually and constantly implement the face shield requirements. Doing so would have provided additional protection to the worker, even from the effects of the employee’s own actions.